Eyes Wide Open

The explosive rise in the U.S. incarceration rate in the second half of the twentieth century, and the racial transformation of the prison population from mostly white at mid-century to sixty-five percent black and Latino in the present day, is a trend that cannot easily be ignored.

Source: The First Civil Right – Hardcover – Naomi Murakawa – Oxford University Press

Princeton’s Naomi Murakawa begins her provocative new book The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America with a jarring statistic: “One black man in the White House; one million black men in the Big House.” Her premise is even more jarring. Rather than blame postwar tough-on-crime conservatives for the incarceration epidemic, she documents a case that lays our current prison problems at the doors of the Truman, Johnson, Carter, and Clinton administrations.

If there is one shortcoming with Murakawa’s analysis, it is that it focuses on the federal prison system. What this book begs for is a companion volume – or, indeed, library – to document what happened at the state prison and local jail systems in America.

Nonetheless, this book should be a clarion for us to examine the Incarceration Nation issue as a bipartisan matter. I have little stomach for identity politics as it exists in America today, but victimhood fatigue or ideological differences must neither blind us to uncomfortable facts, nor deter us from the search for answers.

We have too many people in prison, yet we cannot afford to retain dangerous people on our streets or return them there once paroled. The time has come to find a better path that addresses these two challenges than simply more bars, more walls, and more guards.

1 thought on “Eyes Wide Open

  1. If the title of this book were a headline, it would rightly be derided as “clickbait” — a fabulously inaccurate summary of the contents designed to prompt nothing more than an increase in advertising revenue via page impressions.

    The books thesis is actually quite different — which makes me question whether you’ve read it or just an online synopsis.

    It is absolutely true that afraid of being painted as “soft on crime” liberals have gone along with some absolutely dreadful ideas (e.g. “three strikes” and removing judging from the hands of judges with mandatory minimums). But to say that not providing effective opposition is “building” something is, well, no more than clickbait, and the book itself doesn’t actually make that argument (except on the title page).

    If anything, a fair summary would be “liberals are equally culpable in the rise of the Incarceration Nation” — and that’s certainly true.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s