Truth and Syria

Barack Obama did not tell the whole story this autumn when he tried to make the case that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack near Damascus on 21 August. In some instances, he omitted important intelligence, and in others he presented assumptions as facts. Most significant, he failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. In the months before the attack, the American intelligence agencies produced a series of highly classified reports, culminating in a formal Operations Order – a planning document that precedes a ground invasion – citing evidence that the al-Nusra Front, a jihadi group affiliated with al-Qaida, had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity. When the attack occurred al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad.”


“Whose sarin?”
Seymour M. Hersh

London Review of Books
19 December 2013

Advertisements

Author: David Wolf

An adviser to corporations and organizations on strategy, communications, and public affairs, David Wolf has been working and living in Beijing since 1995, and now divides his time between China and California. He also serves as a policy and industry analyst focused on innovative and creative industries, a futurist, and an amateur historian.

4 thoughts on “Truth and Syria”

  1. Personally, I’m disgusted and dismayed by all parties in the Syria conflict. I’m not a whole lot more happy with Obama’s warring activity, particularly with drone warfare.

    1. Agreed on Syria and Obama. On drones, I think we need to recognize that we are undermining our standing in a huge part of the world by engaging in robot warfare. We need to sit down and think through protocols for using drones that address what their current use is doing to our soft power.

  2. In an admittedly wildly “liberal” forum the question was asked recently what the US response would be to an attack by a foreign power on US soil that killed all the participants at a wedding — or even an FBI or ATF raid, after a legitimate and known “bad guy”, that took out the whole family, bridesmaids, best men, children, guests, at a nuptial celebration.

    Drone strikes are wildly asymmetrical, terrorizing, and dehumanize everyone in their decision tree. There’s a four-syllable word that neatly and correctly describes this sort of pseudo-military action…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s